Kanzlei
Mathes & Fischbacher WP/StB

Georgenstraße 39
D-80799 München-Schwabing

Telefon: +49-89-27 37 16-6
Telefax: +49-89-27 37 16-70
info@mathes-fischbacher.de


update: 18.04.2024

Data Protection

We are very deligh­ted that you have shown inte­rest in our enter­pri­se. Data pro­tec­tion is of a par­ti­cu­lar­ly high prio­ri­ty for the manage­ment of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher. The use of the Internet pages of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher is pos­si­ble wit­hout any indi­ca­ti­on of per­so­nal data; howe­ver, if a data sub­ject wants to use spe­cial enter­pri­se ser­vices via our web­site, pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data could beco­me neces­sa­ry. If the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data is neces­sa­ry and the­re is no sta­tu­to­ry basis for such pro­ce­s­sing, we gene­ral­ly obtain con­sent from the data subject.

The pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data, such as the name, address, e‑mail address, or tele­pho­ne num­ber of a data sub­ject shall always be in line with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and in accordance with the coun­try-spe­ci­fic data pro­tec­tion regu­la­ti­ons appli­ca­ble to the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher. By means of this data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on, our enter­pri­se would like to inform the gene­ral public of the natu­re, scope, and pur­po­se of the per­so­nal data we coll­ect, use and pro­cess. Furthermore, data sub­jects are infor­med, by means of this data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on, of the rights to which they are entitled.

As the con­trol­ler, the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher has imple­men­ted num­e­rous tech­ni­cal and orga­nizatio­nal mea­su­res to ensu­re the most com­ple­te pro­tec­tion of per­so­nal data pro­ce­s­sed through this web­site. However, Internet-based data trans­mis­si­ons may in prin­ci­ple have secu­ri­ty gaps, so abso­lu­te pro­tec­tion may not be gua­ran­teed. For this rea­son, every data sub­ject is free to trans­fer per­so­nal data to us via alter­na­ti­ve means, e.g. by telephone.

1. Definitions

The data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher is based on the terms used by the European legis­la­tor for the adop­ti­on of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Our data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on should be legi­ble and under­stan­da­ble for the gene­ral public, as well as our cus­to­mers and busi­ness part­ners. To ensu­re this, we would like to first explain the ter­mi­no­lo­gy used.

In this data pro­tec­tion decla­ra­ti­on, we use, inter alia, the fol­lo­wing terms:

  • a) Personal data

    Personal data means any infor­ma­ti­on rela­ting to an iden­ti­fi­ed or iden­ti­fia­ble natu­ral per­son (“data sub­ject”). An iden­ti­fia­ble natu­ral per­son is one who can be iden­ti­fi­ed, direct­ly or indi­rect­ly, in par­ti­cu­lar by refe­rence to an iden­ti­fier such as a name, an iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on num­ber, loca­ti­on data, an online iden­ti­fier or to one or more fac­tors spe­ci­fic to the phy­si­cal, phy­sio­lo­gi­cal, gene­tic, men­tal, eco­no­mic, cul­tu­ral or social iden­ti­ty of that natu­ral person.

  • b) Data subject

    Data sub­ject is any iden­ti­fi­ed or iden­ti­fia­ble natu­ral per­son, who­se per­so­nal data is pro­ce­s­sed by the con­trol­ler respon­si­ble for the processing.

  • c) Processing

    Processing is any ope­ra­ti­on or set of ope­ra­ti­ons which is per­for­med on per­so­nal data or on sets of per­so­nal data, whe­ther or not by auto­ma­ted means, such as coll­ec­tion, recor­ding, orga­ni­sa­ti­on, struc­tu­ring, sto­rage, adap­t­ati­on or altera­ti­on, retrie­val, con­sul­ta­ti­on, use, dis­clo­sure by trans­mis­si­on, dis­se­mi­na­ti­on or other­wi­se making available, ali­gnment or com­bi­na­ti­on, rest­ric­tion, era­su­re or destruction.

  • d) Restriction of processing

    Restriction of pro­ce­s­sing is the mar­king of stored per­so­nal data with the aim of limi­ting their pro­ce­s­sing in the future.

  • e) Profiling

    Profiling means any form of auto­ma­ted pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data con­si­sting of the use of per­so­nal data to eva­lua­te cer­tain per­so­nal aspects rela­ting to a natu­ral per­son, in par­ti­cu­lar to ana­ly­se or pre­dict aspects con­cer­ning that natu­ral person’s per­for­mance at work, eco­no­mic situa­ti­on, health, per­so­nal pre­fe­ren­ces, inte­rests, relia­bi­li­ty, beha­viour, loca­ti­on or movements.

  • f) Pseudonymisation

    Pseudonymisation is the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data in such a man­ner that the per­so­nal data can no lon­ger be attri­bu­ted to a spe­ci­fic data sub­ject wit­hout the use of addi­tio­nal infor­ma­ti­on, pro­vi­ded that such addi­tio­nal infor­ma­ti­on is kept sepa­ra­te­ly and is sub­ject to tech­ni­cal and orga­ni­sa­tio­nal mea­su­res to ensu­re that the per­so­nal data are not attri­bu­ted to an iden­ti­fi­ed or iden­ti­fia­ble natu­ral person.

  • g) Controller or controller responsible for the processing

    Controller or con­trol­ler respon­si­ble for the pro­ce­s­sing is the natu­ral or legal per­son, public aut­ho­ri­ty, agen­cy or other body which, alo­ne or joint­ly with others, deter­mi­nes the pur­po­ses and means of the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data; whe­re the pur­po­ses and means of such pro­ce­s­sing are deter­mi­ned by Union or Member State law, the con­trol­ler or the spe­ci­fic cri­te­ria for its nomi­na­ti­on may be pro­vi­ded for by Union or Member State law.

  • h) Processor

    Processor is a natu­ral or legal per­son, public aut­ho­ri­ty, agen­cy or other body which pro­ce­s­ses per­so­nal data on behalf of the controller.

  • i) Recipient

    Recipient is a natu­ral or legal per­son, public aut­ho­ri­ty, agen­cy or ano­ther body, to which the per­so­nal data are dis­c­lo­sed, whe­ther a third par­ty or not. However, public aut­ho­ri­ties which may recei­ve per­so­nal data in the frame­work of a par­ti­cu­lar inquiry in accordance with Union or Member State law shall not be regard­ed as reci­pi­en­ts; the pro­ce­s­sing of tho­se data by tho­se public aut­ho­ri­ties shall be in com­pli­ance with the appli­ca­ble data pro­tec­tion rules accor­ding to the pur­po­ses of the processing.

  • j) Third party

    Third par­ty is a natu­ral or legal per­son, public aut­ho­ri­ty, agen­cy or body other than the data sub­ject, con­trol­ler, pro­ces­sor and per­sons who, under the direct aut­ho­ri­ty of the con­trol­ler or pro­ces­sor, are aut­ho­ri­sed to pro­cess per­so­nal data.

  • k) Consent

    Consent of the data sub­ject is any free­ly given, spe­ci­fic, infor­med and unam­bi­guous indi­ca­ti­on of the data subject’s wis­hes by which he or she, by a state­ment or by a clear affir­ma­ti­ve action, signi­fi­es agree­ment to the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data rela­ting to him or her.

2. Name and Address of the controller

Controller for the pur­po­ses of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), other data pro­tec­tion laws appli­ca­ble in Member sta­tes of the European Union and other pro­vi­si­ons rela­ted to data pro­tec­tion is:

Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher
Georgenstraße 39
80799 München-Schwabing
Deutschland
Phone: +49–89-27 37 16–6
Email: info@mathes-fischbacher.de
Website: www.mathesundfischbacher.de

3. Cookies

Cookie Consent with Borlabs Cookie
Our web­site uses the Borlabs coo­kie con­sent tech­no­lo­gy to obtain your con­sent to the sto­rage of cer­tain coo­kies in your brow­ser and for their data pri­va­cy pro­tec­tion com­pli­ant docu­men­ta­ti­on. The pro­vi­der of this tech­no­lo­gy is Borlabs – Benjamin A. Bornschein, Rübenkamp 32, 22305 Hamburg, Germany (her­ein­af­ter refer­red to as Borlabs).

Whenever you visit our web­site, a Borlabs coo­kie will be stored in your brow­ser, which archi­ves any decla­ra­ti­ons or revo­ca­ti­ons of con­sent you have ente­red. These data are not shared with the pro­vi­der of the Borlabs technology.The appoint­ment data is stored for us on the ser­vers of Calendly, who­se pri­va­cy poli­cy can be view­ed here: https://calendly.com/de/pages/privacy.

The recor­ded data shall remain archi­ved until you ask us to era­di­ca­te them, dele­te the Borlabs coo­kie on your own or the pur­po­se of sto­ring the data no lon­ger exists. This shall be wit­hout pre­ju­di­ce to any reten­ti­on obli­ga­ti­ons man­da­ted by law. To review the details of Borlabs’ data pro­ce­s­sing poli­ci­es, plea­se visit https://de.borlabs.io/kb/welche-daten-speichert-borlabs-cookie/

We use the Borlabs coo­kie con­sent tech­no­lo­gy to obtain the decla­ra­ti­ons of con­sent man­da­ted by law for the use of coo­kies. The legal basis for the use of such coo­kies is Art. 6 Sect. 1 Sentence 1 lit. c GDPR.



The Internet pages of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher use coo­kies. Cookies are text files that are stored in a com­pu­ter system via an Internet browser.

Many Internet sites and ser­vers use coo­kies. Many coo­kies con­tain a so-cal­led coo­kie ID. A coo­kie ID is a uni­que iden­ti­fier of the coo­kie. It con­sists of a cha­rac­ter string through which Internet pages and ser­vers can be assi­gned to the spe­ci­fic Internet brow­ser in which the coo­kie was stored. This allo­ws visi­ted Internet sites and ser­vers to dif­fe­ren­tia­te the indi­vi­du­al brow­ser of the dats sub­ject from other Internet brow­sers that con­tain other coo­kies. A spe­ci­fic Internet brow­ser can be reco­gnized and iden­ti­fi­ed using the uni­que coo­kie ID.

Through the use of coo­kies, the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher can pro­vi­de the users of this web­site with more user-fri­end­ly ser­vices that would not be pos­si­ble wit­hout the coo­kie setting.

By means of a coo­kie, the infor­ma­ti­on and offers on our web­site can be opti­mi­zed with the user in mind. Cookies allow us, as pre­vious­ly men­tio­ned, to reco­gnize our web­site users. The pur­po­se of this reco­gni­ti­on is to make it easier for users to uti­li­ze our web­site. The web­site user that uses coo­kies, e.g. does not have to enter access data each time the web­site is acce­s­sed, becau­se this is taken over by the web­site, and the coo­kie is thus stored on the user’s com­pu­ter system. Another exam­p­le is the coo­kie of a shop­ping cart in an online shop. The online store remem­bers the artic­les that a cus­to­mer has pla­ced in the vir­tu­al shop­ping cart via a cookie.

The data sub­ject may, at any time, pre­vent the set­ting of coo­kies through our web­site by means of a cor­re­spon­ding set­ting of the Internet brow­ser used, and may thus per­ma­nent­ly deny the set­ting of coo­kies. Furthermore, alre­a­dy set coo­kies may be dele­ted at any time via an Internet brow­ser or other soft­ware pro­grams. This is pos­si­ble in all popu­lar Internet brow­sers. If the data sub­ject deac­ti­va­tes the set­ting of coo­kies in the Internet brow­ser used, not all func­tions of our web­site may be enti­re­ly usable.

4. Collection of general data and information

The web­site of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher coll­ects a series of gene­ral data and infor­ma­ti­on when a data sub­ject or auto­ma­ted system calls up the web­site. This gene­ral data and infor­ma­ti­on are stored in the ser­ver log files. Collected may be (1) the brow­ser types and ver­si­ons used, (2) the ope­ra­ting system used by the acce­s­sing system, (3) the web­site from which an acce­s­sing system rea­ches our web­site (so-cal­led refer­rers), (4) the sub-web­sites, (5) the date and time of access to the Internet site, (6) an Internet pro­to­col address (IP address), (7) the Internet ser­vice pro­vi­der of the acce­s­sing system, and (8) any other simi­lar data and infor­ma­ti­on that may be used in the event of attacks on our infor­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gy systems.

When using the­se gene­ral data and infor­ma­ti­on, the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher does not draw any con­clu­si­ons about the data sub­ject. Rather, this infor­ma­ti­on is nee­ded to (1) deli­ver the con­tent of our web­site cor­rect­ly, (2) opti­mi­ze the con­tent of our web­site as well as its adver­ti­se­ment, (3) ensu­re the long-term via­bi­li­ty of our infor­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gy systems and web­site tech­no­lo­gy, and (4) pro­vi­de law enforce­ment aut­ho­ri­ties with the infor­ma­ti­on neces­sa­ry for cri­mi­nal pro­se­cu­ti­on in case of a cyber-attack. Therefore, the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher ana­ly­zes anony­mously coll­ec­ted data and infor­ma­ti­on sta­tis­ti­cal­ly, with the aim of incre­a­sing the data pro­tec­tion and data secu­ri­ty of our enter­pri­se, and to ensu­re an opti­mal level of pro­tec­tion for the per­so­nal data we pro­cess. The anony­mous data of the ser­ver log files are stored sepa­ra­te­ly from all per­so­nal data pro­vi­ded by a data subject.

5. Contact possibility via the website

The web­site of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher con­ta­ins infor­ma­ti­on that enables a quick elec­tro­nic cont­act to our enter­pri­se, as well as direct com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on with us, which also inclu­des a gene­ral address of the so-cal­led elec­tro­nic mail (e‑mail address). If a data sub­ject cont­acts the con­trol­ler by e‑mail or via a cont­act form, the per­so­nal data trans­mit­ted by the data sub­ject are auto­ma­ti­cal­ly stored. Such per­so­nal data trans­mit­ted on a vol­un­t­a­ry basis by a data sub­ject to the data con­trol­ler are stored for the pur­po­se of pro­ce­s­sing or cont­ac­ting the data sub­ject. There is no trans­fer of this per­so­nal data to third parties.

6. Routine erasure and blocking of personal data

The data con­trol­ler shall pro­cess and store the per­so­nal data of the data sub­ject only for the peri­od neces­sa­ry to achie­ve the pur­po­se of sto­rage, or as far as this is gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor or other legis­la­tors in laws or regu­la­ti­ons to which the con­trol­ler is sub­ject to.

If the sto­rage pur­po­se is not appli­ca­ble, or if a sto­rage peri­od pre­scri­bed by the European legis­la­tor or ano­ther com­pe­tent legis­la­tor expi­res, the per­so­nal data are rou­ti­ne­ly blocked or era­sed in accordance with legal requirements.

7. Rights of the data subject

  • a) Right of confirmation

    Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler the con­fir­ma­ti­on as to whe­ther or not per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her are being pro­ce­s­sed. If a data sub­ject wis­hes to avail hims­elf of this right of con­fir­ma­ti­on, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the controller.

  • b) Right of access

    Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler free infor­ma­ti­on about his or her per­so­nal data stored at any time and a copy of this infor­ma­ti­on. Furthermore, the European direc­ti­ves and regu­la­ti­ons grant the data sub­ject access to the fol­lo­wing information:

    • the pur­po­ses of the processing;
    • the cate­go­ries of per­so­nal data concerned;
    • the reci­pi­en­ts or cate­go­ries of reci­pi­en­ts to whom the per­so­nal data have been or will be dis­c­lo­sed, in par­ti­cu­lar reci­pi­en­ts in third count­ries or inter­na­tio­nal organisations;
    • whe­re pos­si­ble, the envi­sa­ged peri­od for which the per­so­nal data will be stored, or, if not pos­si­ble, the cri­te­ria used to deter­mi­ne that period;
    • the exi­stence of the right to request from the con­trol­ler rec­ti­fi­ca­ti­on or era­su­re of per­so­nal data, or rest­ric­tion of pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning the data sub­ject, or to object to such processing;
    • the exi­stence of the right to lodge a com­plaint with a super­vi­so­ry authority;
    • whe­re the per­so­nal data are not coll­ec­ted from the data sub­ject, any available infor­ma­ti­on as to their source;
    • the exi­stence of auto­ma­ted decis­i­on-making, inclu­ding pro­fil­ing, refer­red to in Article 22(1) and (4) of the GDPR and, at least in tho­se cases, meaningful infor­ma­ti­on about the logic invol­ved, as well as the signi­fi­can­ce and envi­sa­ged con­se­quen­ces of such pro­ce­s­sing for the data subject.

    Furthermore, the data sub­ject shall have a right to obtain infor­ma­ti­on as to whe­ther per­so­nal data are trans­fer­red to a third coun­try or to an inter­na­tio­nal orga­ni­sa­ti­on. Where this is the case, the data sub­ject shall have the right to be infor­med of the appro­pria­te safe­guards rela­ting to the transfer.

    If a data sub­ject wis­hes to avail hims­elf of this right of access, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the controller.

  • c) Right to rectification

    Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler wit­hout undue delay the rec­ti­fi­ca­ti­on of inac­cu­ra­te per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her. Taking into account the pur­po­ses of the pro­ce­s­sing, the data sub­ject shall have the right to have incom­ple­te per­so­nal data com­ple­ted, inclu­ding by means of pro­vi­ding a sup­ple­men­ta­ry statement.

    If a data sub­ject wis­hes to exer­cise this right to rec­ti­fi­ca­ti­on, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the controller.

  • d) Right to erasure (Right to be forgotten)

    Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler the era­su­re of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her wit­hout undue delay, and the con­trol­ler shall have the obli­ga­ti­on to era­se per­so­nal data wit­hout undue delay whe­re one of the fol­lo­wing grounds applies, as long as the pro­ce­s­sing is not necessary:

    • The per­so­nal data are no lon­ger neces­sa­ry in rela­ti­on to the pur­po­ses for which they were coll­ec­ted or other­wi­se processed.
    • The data sub­ject with­draws con­sent to which the pro­ce­s­sing is based accor­ding to point (a) of Article 6(1) of the GDPR, or point (a) of Article 9(2) of the GDPR, and whe­re the­re is no other legal ground for the processing.
    • The data sub­ject objects to the pro­ce­s­sing pur­su­ant to Article 21(1) of the GDPR and the­re are no over­ri­ding legi­ti­ma­te grounds for the pro­ce­s­sing, or the data sub­ject objects to the pro­ce­s­sing pur­su­ant to Article 21(2) of the GDPR.
    • The per­so­nal data have been unlawful­ly processed.
    • The per­so­nal data must be era­sed for com­pli­ance with a legal obli­ga­ti­on in Union or Member State law to which the con­trol­ler is subject.
    • The per­so­nal data have been coll­ec­ted in rela­ti­on to the offer of infor­ma­ti­on socie­ty ser­vices refer­red to in Article 8(1) of the GDPR.

    If one of the afo­re­men­tio­ned rea­sons applies, and a data sub­ject wis­hes to request the era­su­re of per­so­nal data stored by the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the con­trol­ler. An employee of Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher shall prompt­ly ensu­re that the era­su­re request is com­plied with immediately.

    Where the con­trol­ler has made per­so­nal data public and is obli­ged pur­su­ant to Article 17(1) to era­se the per­so­nal data, the con­trol­ler, taking account of available tech­no­lo­gy and the cost of imple­men­ta­ti­on, shall take rea­sonable steps, inclu­ding tech­ni­cal mea­su­res, to inform other con­trol­lers pro­ce­s­sing the per­so­nal data that the data sub­ject has reque­sted era­su­re by such con­trol­lers of any links to, or copy or repli­ca­ti­on of, tho­se per­so­nal data, as far as pro­ce­s­sing is not requi­red. An employees of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher will arran­ge the neces­sa­ry mea­su­res in indi­vi­du­al cases.

  • e) Right of restriction of processing

    Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor to obtain from the con­trol­ler rest­ric­tion of pro­ce­s­sing whe­re one of the fol­lo­wing applies:

    • The accu­ra­cy of the per­so­nal data is con­te­sted by the data sub­ject, for a peri­od enab­ling the con­trol­ler to veri­fy the accu­ra­cy of the per­so­nal data.
    • The pro­ce­s­sing is unlawful and the data sub­ject oppo­ses the era­su­re of the per­so­nal data and requests instead the rest­ric­tion of their use instead.
    • The con­trol­ler no lon­ger needs the per­so­nal data for the pur­po­ses of the pro­ce­s­sing, but they are requi­red by the data sub­ject for the estab­lish­ment, exer­cise or defence of legal claims.
    • The data sub­ject has objec­ted to pro­ce­s­sing pur­su­ant to Article 21(1) of the GDPR pen­ding the veri­fi­ca­ti­on whe­ther the legi­ti­ma­te grounds of the con­trol­ler over­ri­de tho­se of the data subject.

    If one of the afo­re­men­tio­ned con­di­ti­ons is met, and a data sub­ject wis­hes to request the rest­ric­tion of the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data stored by the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher, he or she may at any time cont­act any employee of the con­trol­ler. The employee of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher will arran­ge the rest­ric­tion of the processing.

  • f) Right to data portability

    Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor, to recei­ve the per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her, which was pro­vi­ded to a con­trol­ler, in a struc­tu­red, com­mon­ly used and machi­ne-rea­da­ble for­mat. He or she shall have the right to trans­mit tho­se data to ano­ther con­trol­ler wit­hout hin­drance from the con­trol­ler to which the per­so­nal data have been pro­vi­ded, as long as the pro­ce­s­sing is based on con­sent pur­su­ant to point (a) of Article 6(1) of the GDPR or point (a) of Article 9(2) of the GDPR, or on a con­tract pur­su­ant to point (b) of Article 6(1) of the GDPR, and the pro­ce­s­sing is car­ri­ed out by auto­ma­ted means, as long as the pro­ce­s­sing is not neces­sa­ry for the per­for­mance of a task car­ri­ed out in the public inte­rest or in the exer­cise of offi­ci­al aut­ho­ri­ty vested in the controller.

    Furthermore, in exer­cis­ing his or her right to data por­ta­bi­li­ty pur­su­ant to Article 20(1) of the GDPR, the data sub­ject shall have the right to have per­so­nal data trans­mit­ted direct­ly from one con­trol­ler to ano­ther, whe­re tech­ni­cal­ly fea­si­ble and when doing so does not adver­se­ly affect the rights and free­doms of others.

    In order to assert the right to data por­ta­bi­li­ty, the data sub­ject may at any time cont­act any employee of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher.

  • g) Right to object

    Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor to object, on grounds rela­ting to his or her par­ti­cu­lar situa­ti­on, at any time, to pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her, which is based on point (e) or (f) of Article 6(1) of the GDPR. This also applies to pro­fil­ing based on the­se provisions.

    The Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher shall no lon­ger pro­cess the per­so­nal data in the event of the objec­tion, unless we can demon­stra­te com­pel­ling legi­ti­ma­te grounds for the pro­ce­s­sing which over­ri­de the inte­rests, rights and free­doms of the data sub­ject, or for the estab­lish­ment, exer­cise or defence of legal claims.

    If the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher pro­ce­s­ses per­so­nal data for direct mar­ke­ting pur­po­ses, the data sub­ject shall have the right to object at any time to pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her for such mar­ke­ting. This applies to pro­fil­ing to the ext­ent that it is rela­ted to such direct mar­ke­ting. If the data sub­ject objects to the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher to the pro­ce­s­sing for direct mar­ke­ting pur­po­ses, the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher will no lon­ger pro­cess the per­so­nal data for the­se purposes.

    In addi­ti­on, the data sub­ject has the right, on grounds rela­ting to his or her par­ti­cu­lar situa­ti­on, to object to pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data con­cer­ning him or her by the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher for sci­en­ti­fic or histo­ri­cal rese­arch pur­po­ses, or for sta­tis­ti­cal pur­po­ses pur­su­ant to Article 89(1) of the GDPR, unless the pro­ce­s­sing is neces­sa­ry for the per­for­mance of a task car­ri­ed out for rea­sons of public interest.

    In order to exer­cise the right to object, the data sub­ject may cont­act any employee of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher. In addi­ti­on, the data sub­ject is free in the con­text of the use of infor­ma­ti­on socie­ty ser­vices, and not­wi­th­stan­ding Directive 2002/​58/​EC, to use his or her right to object by auto­ma­ted means using tech­ni­cal specifications.

  • h) Automated individual decision-making, including profiling

    Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor not to be sub­ject to a decis­i­on based sole­ly on auto­ma­ted pro­ce­s­sing, inclu­ding pro­fil­ing, which pro­du­ces legal effects con­cer­ning him or her, or simi­lar­ly signi­fi­cant­ly affects him or her, as long as the decis­i­on (1) is not is neces­sa­ry for ente­ring into, or the per­for­mance of, a con­tract bet­ween the data sub­ject and a data con­trol­ler, or (2) is not aut­ho­ri­sed by Union or Member State law to which the con­trol­ler is sub­ject and which also lays down sui­ta­ble mea­su­res to safe­guard the data subject’s rights and free­doms and legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests, or (3) is not based on the data subject’s expli­cit consent.

    If the decis­i­on (1) is neces­sa­ry for ente­ring into, or the per­for­mance of, a con­tract bet­ween the data sub­ject and a data con­trol­ler, or (2) it is based on the data subject’s expli­cit con­sent, the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher shall imple­ment sui­ta­ble mea­su­res to safe­guard the data subject’s rights and free­doms and legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests, at least the right to obtain human inter­ven­ti­on on the part of the con­trol­ler, to express his or her point of view and con­test the decision.

    If the data sub­ject wis­hes to exer­cise the rights con­cer­ning auto­ma­ted indi­vi­du­al decis­i­on-making, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher.

  • i) Right to withdraw data protection consent

    Each data sub­ject shall have the right gran­ted by the European legis­la­tor to with­draw his or her con­sent to pro­ce­s­sing of his or her per­so­nal data at any time.

    If the data sub­ject wis­hes to exer­cise the right to with­draw the con­sent, he or she may, at any time, cont­act any employee of the Kanzlei Mathes & Fischbacher.

8. Legal basis for the processing

Art. 6(1) lit. a GDPR ser­ves as the legal basis for pro­ce­s­sing ope­ra­ti­ons for which we obtain con­sent for a spe­ci­fic pro­ce­s­sing pur­po­se. If the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data is neces­sa­ry for the per­for­mance of a con­tract to which the data sub­ject is par­ty, as is the case, for exam­p­le, when pro­ce­s­sing ope­ra­ti­ons are neces­sa­ry for the sup­p­ly of goods or to pro­vi­de any other ser­vice, the pro­ce­s­sing is based on Article 6(1) lit. b GDPR. The same applies to such pro­ce­s­sing ope­ra­ti­ons which are neces­sa­ry for car­ry­ing out pre-con­trac­tu­al mea­su­res, for exam­p­le in the case of inqui­ries con­cer­ning our pro­ducts or ser­vices. Is our com­pa­ny sub­ject to a legal obli­ga­ti­on by which pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data is requi­red, such as for the ful­fill­ment of tax obli­ga­ti­ons, the pro­ce­s­sing is based on Art. 6(1) lit. c GDPR.
In rare cases, the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data may be neces­sa­ry to pro­tect the vital inte­rests of the data sub­ject or of ano­ther natu­ral per­son. This would be the case, for exam­p­le, if a visi­tor were inju­red in our com­pa­ny and his name, age, health insu­rance data or other vital infor­ma­ti­on would have to be pas­sed on to a doc­tor, hos­pi­tal or other third par­ty. Then the pro­ce­s­sing would be based on Art. 6(1) lit. d GDPR.
Finally, pro­ce­s­sing ope­ra­ti­ons could be based on Article 6(1) lit. f GDPR. This legal basis is used for pro­ce­s­sing ope­ra­ti­ons which are not cover­ed by any of the abo­ve­men­tio­ned legal grounds, if pro­ce­s­sing is neces­sa­ry for the pur­po­ses of the legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests pur­sued by our com­pa­ny or by a third par­ty, except whe­re such inte­rests are over­ridden by the inte­rests or fun­da­men­tal rights and free­doms of the data sub­ject which requi­re pro­tec­tion of per­so­nal data. Such pro­ce­s­sing ope­ra­ti­ons are par­ti­cu­lar­ly per­mis­si­ble becau­se they have been spe­ci­fi­cal­ly men­tio­ned by the European legis­la­tor. He con­side­red that a legi­ti­ma­te inte­rest could be assu­med if the data sub­ject is a cli­ent of the con­trol­ler (Recital 47 Sentence 2 GDPR).

9. The legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party

Where the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data is based on Article 6(1) lit. f GDPR our legi­ti­ma­te inte­rest is to car­ry out our busi­ness in favor of the well-being of all our employees and the shareholders.

10. Period for which the personal data will be stored

The cri­te­ria used to deter­mi­ne the peri­od of sto­rage of per­so­nal data is the respec­ti­ve sta­tu­to­ry reten­ti­on peri­od. After expi­ra­ti­on of that peri­od, the cor­re­spon­ding data is rou­ti­ne­ly dele­ted, as long as it is no lon­ger neces­sa­ry for the ful­fill­ment of the con­tract or the initia­ti­on of a contract.

11. Provision of personal data as statutory or contractual requirement; Requirement necessary to enter into a contract; Obligation of the data subject to provide the personal data; possible consequences of failure to provide such data

We cla­ri­fy that the pro­vi­si­on of per­so­nal data is part­ly requi­red by law (e.g. tax regu­la­ti­ons) or can also result from con­trac­tu­al pro­vi­si­ons (e.g. infor­ma­ti­on on the con­trac­tu­al partner).

Sometimes it may be neces­sa­ry to con­clude a con­tract that the data sub­ject pro­vi­des us with per­so­nal data, which must sub­se­quent­ly be pro­ce­s­sed by us. The data sub­ject is, for exam­p­le, obli­ged to pro­vi­de us with per­so­nal data when our com­pa­ny signs a con­tract with him or her. The non-pro­vi­si­on of the per­so­nal data would have the con­se­quence that the con­tract with the data sub­ject could not be concluded.

Before per­so­nal data is pro­vi­ded by the data sub­ject, the data sub­ject must cont­act any employee. The employee cla­ri­fi­es to the data sub­ject whe­ther the pro­vi­si­on of the per­so­nal data is requi­red by law or con­tract or is neces­sa­ry for the con­clu­si­on of the con­tract, whe­ther the­re is an obli­ga­ti­on to pro­vi­de the per­so­nal data and the con­se­quen­ces of non-pro­vi­si­on of the per­so­nal data.

12. Existence of automated decision-making

As a respon­si­ble com­pa­ny, we do not use auto­ma­tic decis­i­on-making or profiling.

External Hosting

This web­site is hosted by an exter­nal ser­vice pro­vi­der (host). Personal data coll­ec­ted on this web­site are stored on the ser­vers of the host. These may include, but are not limi­t­ed to, IP addres­ses, cont­act requests, meta­da­ta and com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons, con­tract infor­ma­ti­on, cont­act infor­ma­ti­on, names, web page access, and other data gene­ra­ted through a web site.

The host is used for the pur­po­se of ful­fil­ling the con­tract with our poten­ti­al and exi­sting cus­to­mers (Art. 6 para. 1 lit. b GDPR) and in the inte­rest of secu­re, fast, and effi­ci­ent pro­vi­si­on of our online ser­vices by a pro­fes­sio­nal pro­vi­der (Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f GDPR).

Our host will only pro­cess your data to the ext­ent neces­sa­ry to ful­fil its per­for­mance obli­ga­ti­ons and to fol­low our ins­truc­tions with respect to such data.

We are using the fol­lo­wing host:

WildCat Media Service
Inhaber Thomas Albrecht
Alte Mälzerei, Katharina-Fischer-Platz 1
85435 Erding

Execution of a con­tract data pro­ce­s­sing agreement
In order to gua­ran­tee pro­ce­s­sing in com­pli­ance with data pro­tec­tion regu­la­ti­ons, we have con­clu­ded an order pro­ce­s­sing con­tract with our host.

This Privacy Policy has been gene­ra­ted by the Privacy Policy Generator of the DGD – Your External DPO that was deve­lo­ped in coöpe­ra­ti­on with RC GmbH, which sells used com­pu­ters and the German Lawyers from WILDE BEUGER SOLMECKE, Cologne.